"The Power of One"

News & Blog

  • Jail Time Does Prevent Violent Crimes:

    Our criminal justice system in Canada is a joke.

    My son – Brian Ludwig – was murdered on the 26 August 2012. He was the victim of a One Punch Homicide. His killer hit him from behind. His killer walked away a free man.

    I know the argument for not putting people in jail is that “jail time does not prevent crimes”.

    Hog-wash!

    Sometime prior to him killing Brian, he had been before the Canadian criminal courts on an “assault charge”. This charge was dropped. Had the Canadian criminal legal system done their job the way they are paid to do so, he would have been in jail and Brian would be alive today.

    You understand that right – Brian would still be alive today.

    He spent one week in jail for Brian’s murder before he was let out on $3000 bail. One of the bail conditions was that he refrains from using drugs and alcohol and that he not attend away from bars (drinking establishments). In March 2013, he was arrested at the corner of 18 Street and Queensland Drive (Calgary) in his vehicle and charged with “impaired driving.”

    Back to jail where he promptly appealed to a higher court and was let back out on the streets. In March 2014, the Court of the Queens Bench dropped this charge too. The arresting police officer made a “fatal mistake” they said.

    June 2014 the manslaughter charges against him were “stayed” which is just a fancy term for “dropped”. Too bad we don’t have a video of the murder they told us.

    December 2014 this exemplary citizen of Canada was again arrested. However, the charges were of a lesser charge that wouldn’t result in jail time. An example of that might be “in possession of a stolen vehicle”.

    In February 2015, he had a court date for “failing to comply.”

    Then in March 2015, he was again back in jail and charge with “armed robbery”. This time, a whopping big bail amount was set – much more than for Brian’s murder - $18.000.

    So you still think we have a good legal system?

    Think again.

    Angela Ludwig - 3 March 2016.

    https://www.change.org/p/honourable-jody-wilson-raybould-the-great-canadian-injustice-system?recruiter=426199974&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=des-md-no_src-reason_msg&fb_ref=Default

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMwI0GWB7Ik

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMwI0GWB7Ik

    Read more...

    0 comments

  • Victim Impact Statement

    The third anniversary of Brian's brutal murder has come and gone. Since I never got the chance to address his incomprehensible death in court, I thought I would do it this way.

    The Victim Impact statement in Canada is nothing like its US counterpart in several ways.

    In Canada is it a condescending act bestowed upon the peons by the judicial aristocracy with the hope that you will simply fade away into oblivion. The Judicial aristocracy doesn't want your input; they have been forced to allow minimal trespassing of the electorate in their courtrooms by the lobbing of victim impact groups.

    The presiding judge wants your Statement well in advance of the trial and then he/she will maybe allow only 1 or 2 people to stand up in court and tearfully recite it.

    In Canada,

    1. The trial judge and jury do not give any weight to Victim Impact Statements. They do in the US.

    2. The Victim Impact statement in Canada is censored by the trial judge. He/she edits your statement. He/she tells you what you can say or cannot say. You are told that you can only talk about how the violent act affected your life.

    3. You cannot call the offending act a 'murder' even though it is.

    4. You cannot get into the witness box and tell the offender what you think of him/her. You cannot tell the offender that you think he/she is a piece of garbage and hope he rots in hell. You would get thrown out. In the US, you can do that.

    If the charges against the perpetrator had not been stayed, the trial for the murder of Brian would be happening right about now.

    There were four of us who were preparing a Victim Impact Statements; myself; Brian's daughter, Mikita; Brian's wife, Karen; and Brian's sister, Heather. Ron elected not to do it because of the hypocrisy surrounding this court event.

    Of the four of us, I have no idea if I would have been allowed to do this.

    Rather than talk about how this catastrophic event shaped our lives (it was all negative) I decided to accentuate the positive. Especially in a murder trial - whereby the defence attorney trashes the victim and drags their name through the mud - all in the game to get his client set free.

    Good idea - put him back out on the street where he can perhaps commit armed robbery next.

    This is what I would have said………

    Good Morning. I am Angela Ludwig, Brian's mother.

    On behalf of my husband, Ron and myself, rather than take you on a verbal journey into the horror that Brian's violent death has thrown us, I want this court and the jury to know more about the son we lost and to recognize how extra-ordinary he truly was.

    Other than his uncommon natural athletic ability and his mathematical genius, his most remarkable qualities were his human ones.

    Brian was born smiling and with a natural love for all people; Brian never met a person he didn't like and in return, almost everyone who met Brian liked him back; he had a very kind and gentle nature.

    He was very kind to animals.

    He didn’t just enter a room..........he burst into a room with gusto...........no matter how many people were in the room, he claimed it.

    As a family, we always thought he was special, but since his death, many of his friends and acquaintances have verbalized to me that “we didn’t know what we had until we lost him”.

    To quote a business associate of ours, Hank Wieler, an older gentleman who has no children, and who worked with Brian for many years, said to me one day "Brian is the nicest young man I have ever met. He is a good man. If I had ever had a son, I would want him to be just like Brian….."

    Sometimes the words of other people can convey a more adequate testimony to someone's character than a parent. If I can, I would like to read some funeral cards that many of Brian's friends took the time to fill out at his funeral:

    Richard said " My favorite memory of him is his smile - always big, bright and sincere……….."

    Dave said "when times got tough [in team competitions], Brian always brought us up…[when we were losing], he would say, don't worry about it….he always had the right things to say….."

    Bob said "my favorite memory of him is that wonderful smile, quick wit and intelligence….."

    Daryl said "I consider myself a good judge of character. In Brian's case, I was a good judge of great character. Brian was Loving, Understanding, Devoted, he was a winner, he had integrity and he was giving……I have known Brian for only 3 years, but I am envious of the friends and family that have known him for so long…."

    Bryan and Jenn said "Brian always had a permanent smile on his face, even when he wasn't intending to. He will be greatly missed! ....."

    Rod Jenkins, his friend for over 30 years said "I can tell you with confidence that Brian was not a bully. He didn’t have to be, he was a big man and he knew that would protect him. I have seen him in the bar before and he would never have started the fight but was not one to back down from one. I can see Brian holding the guy back with one hand and not even throwing a punch……."

    When Brian became a devoted and doting father, his uncle, Scott Andrew, remarked "I didn't know Brian was going to be such a good father……I didn't know he had that in him……."

    And finally, a high school teacher, Brian Utley, once said to me "Brian is such a well-behaved and well-mannered young man."

    When his life at the age of 42 years was snuffed out so brutally in the early Sunday morning hours on the 26th August, 2012, by a single cowardly punch to the back of his head, he was just starting to hit his stride. He had dreams - a 20 year vision - that he was enacting upon.

    For the last 3 years of his life, he had been involved with city planners and environmentalists about a 53 acre parcel of land that he was going to develop into recreational lots. He dreamt big.

    Yes he had dreams and he was following his dreams.

    Brian was everything we could have wished for in a son and more…..

    Thank-you for listening to me.

    ANGELA LUDWIG

    Read more...

    0 comments

  • LUDWIG FAMILY HONORS THEIR SON BY SUPPORTING SAIT STUDENTS:

    It was a balmy night in August 2012. What started as an evening of fun and philanthropy ended in tragedy.

    Brian Ludwig, 42, and his team of friends had been playing in a charity golf tournament; in fact they won. They gathered at a local pub to claim their prizes, to celebrate and to socialize. As the evening progressed, a discussion about baseball with another group of customers escalated into an argument. It continued into the parking lot where, without warning, a person came from behind and punched Brian.

    He fell and hit his head on the pavement. Brian died from his injuries. Manslaughter charges were laid, but no one was convicted.

    When Brian died, it left his family heartbroken; it also made headlines and shocked the City of Calgary.

    Since Brian’s parents created the Brian Ludwig Foundation to preserve his memory, promote non-violence and support education.

    Brian’s mother, Angela Ludwig, says the family chose to support SAIT because of Brian’s love of woodworking and construction. She says, even though he never attended SAIT, her son appreciated the practical aspects of the industry.

    Brian had created a thriving home renovation business, combining his knack for business and his love of woodworking and construction. He was also an avid sports enthusiast. As a young man, Brian played hockey at the Junior A level, did some coaching and even played in a European league in his early twenties. In his forties, he opted for more recreational sports, enjoying the social aspects and exercise on the golf course.

    Thanks to the Ludwig family, SAIT students can now apply for two new student awards at SAIT – one for athletics and one in the School of Construction. The $500 School of Construction award goes to a student who is in financial need and demonstrates academic achievement. The $500 athletic award goes to a Trojans hockey player who is also a full-time student, who is in financial need and who also demonstrates community leadership.

    Angela Ludwig says her family chose SAIT because its programs are the ones that fuelled her son’s passion. We hope our contribution will help young people who are financially distressed. We are optimistic our contribution will make a difference in their lives.

    She says the Ludwig family has plans to expand their support of SAIT in memory of Brian. They have pledged to endow a third award and grow the other two. Angela and her husband also say they plan to leave a bequest to SAIT in their wills.

    Individual and Legacy Giving:

    Some people assume they have to be wealthy to create a legacy at SAIT Polytechnic. In fact the majority of SAIT's bequests (gift in a will) are from people of more modest means who want to help our students. Bequests to SAIT can support a range of areas—student awards, curriculum development, equipment purchase, tutoring services, library material and many more.

    There are various ways to plan a legacy gift and we can help you plan your strategy. We can show you how tax laws encourage giving and how donating gifts, such as registered securities, can significantly reduce your taxes and achieve your charitable intentions. The many ways to give a legacy gift to SAIT include:

    • Cash

    • Wills and bequests

    • Publicly traded securities - fill out the Gift of Securities form.

    • RRSPs and RRIFs

    • Life Insurance

    • Real Estate

    • Collections (art, books, etc.)

    • Gifts in kind (equipment and learning tools)

    For more information visit our Ways to Give page or contact Anthony Salekin, Senior Development officer: 403.284.7046 : anthony.salekin@sait.ca

    http://www.sait.ca/alumni/making-a-donation/impact/fall-2014/brian-ludwig-memorial.php

    https://brianludwigfoundation.wordpress.com/author/adludwig/

    http://www.brianludwigfoundation.com/#/brians-story/4573689741

    Read more...

    0 comments

  • 26th August 2014

    To commemorate the second anniversary of Brian's untimely death, we hosted our 'Family and Friends' golf tournament followed by a 'pot-luck and pool party' on Saturday past.

    The golf tournament was small, but feisty. The overall winners of the tournament were Scott Andrew, Trevor Rickards and Mauraine Montgomery who came in under par. Longest drive went to a gal - Laraine Andrew - out-driving all the guys. Closest to pin went to Brian's Dad - Ron Ludwig and longest putt went to Ian Montgomery from Kelowna, BC.

    At our silent auction, Trevor and Tracy Rickards out-bid the other bidders for the bottle of Chateau Mouton Rothschild (Pauillac). Their very sizable bid will fund the first scholarship at SAIT for this fall. A special 'thank-you' to this very special couple.

    And finally, thank-you to everyone who shared this day with us.

    Read more...

    0 comments

  • Error of Impunity:

    Around 9:00 AM Friday, June 27th, 2014 Deputy Assistant Crown Prosecutor, Michael Ewanson, fired a scud missile into the Ludwig Camp.

    He called to inform us that the Crown was going to drop (stay) the charges against the man who threw the deadly punch to the back of Brian Ludwig's head in the early morning hours of the 26th August 2012 outside Swig's Pub, knocking him semi-conscious. Brian had been involved in a disagreement with another man that had ended and he was walking away when, he accused threw a 'cheap shot' to the back left side of his head according to two witnesses at the preliminary hearing in April of this year.

    As Brian lay on the parking lot pavement, with his eyes fluttering, moaning and in cardiac arrest, this man and two of his cohorts stood over him screaming "you got what you deserved you f$@#&^*g a$@#&^*e". These 3 then got into 2 vehicles and sped away.

    Ewanson told us that the Crown was 'staying' the charges because of the contradicting testimony of his two prime witnesses at the preliminary hearing in April of this year. This contradiction is problematic, he said, and if this case were to proceed to trial, in all likelihood will not result in a conviction for the accused. He also said that there were at least 20 other people milling around who witnessed the crime but have not volunteered to come forward to testify. He also said in the event that one or more of these witnesses come forward, then the case will be re-opened. If not, within one year, the charges will be dropped entirely.

    There is an entrenched discrimination within our Canadian legal system towards One Punch Homicides. The jurisprudents (the judges and all attorneys) who work within the legal system can't seem to make an assessment of what category a One Punch Homicide falls into. They repeatedly ask the question 'is it a near accident or a near murder?' An example of this is the judge who presided at the preliminary hearing in April. At one point during the proceedings she referred to the 'One Punch Homicide' of Brian Ludwig as an accident. It baffles me how a punch to the head that causes a death can be deemed an 'accident'.

    What enables this type of thinking within the walls of the Canadian legal system? Many of these "One Punch Homicides' occur at or near a drinking establishment. Quite often, both the killer and the deceased are drunk. And there is a tendency to partially blame the victim for his own death.

    Because of this underlying discrimination, these learned people seem to place the manslaughter charge that is inevitably levied against the One Punch Homicide crime at the bottom end of the manslaughter scale. This manifests itself in several ways. First, sometimes a very light prison sentence is levied - example, two years less a day. Sometimes only house arrest is given to the perpetrator; sometimes time served; and sometimes, as in this case charges are dropped because of a technicality and the cost of a trial is very high.

    The cost to take this to trial is very high and the Crown thinks they don't stand a good chance of a conviction because of contradicting testimony.

    It is every Canadian citizen's basic right to face your attacker in a court of law. However, that courtesy is not going to be extended to us.

    The end result of this 'stay' is that one man is walking away as an innocent man, unencumbered to enjoy the rest of his life.

    Innocent men are put in jail wrongly; the antithesis to that is that guilty men walk away free.

    Brian Ludwig got to only live one-half a life.

    Ron, Heather, Mikita, Phoenix, Karen and I have been given a life sentence.

    Angela Ludwig

    Read more...

    0 comments

Follow us:

Photo crop (passport)

Web feed

You are viewing the text version of this site.

To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.

Need help? check the requirements page.


Get Flash Player